Research Engineering Manager, STEM

Turing builds large-scale datasets and reinforcement learning (RL) environments that power post-training for the world's leading AI labs and enterprises.

The STEM Horizontal team produces the high-signal coding and STEM data frontier labs train on. We're looking for a Research Engineering Manager to lead the research engineering behind its next layer: synthetic data that measurably improves models, and new benchmarks that measure what today's evals miss.

You'll lead a team of research engineers, work side by side with research scientists, and stay close enough to the code to review an eval harness line by line or prototype a generator yourself when the team needs it. You'll also build the team: hiring research engineers is a core part of this role, not a side task. Ideally you've been on the other side, at a frontier lab, and know what makes a lab trust a dataset or a benchmark result.

• Synthetic data that earns its place. Generation, verification, and filtering pipelines where every sample is checked, and where we can show which properties of the data drive downstream gains, not just how much of it we made.
• Benchmarks that stay meaningful. New evaluations for capabilities current benchmarks miss, built with calibrated difficulty, contamination controls, and statistics strong enough that a lab can make a decision on the result.

Quality failures here are quiet. A subtle bug in a verifier doesn't crash anything; it ships thousands of wrong labels into someone's training run and costs weeks. If you want to build the team and the systems that catch that early, this is the seat.

• Build the team: define the profiles you need, run hiring, and grow research engineers selected for research taste as much as engineering rigor.
• Run the team's operating rhythm: project selection, planning, experiment reviews, design docs, and clear ownership.
• Coach engineers on experimental design, code quality, and presenting results; give direct, regular feedback and run fair performance cycles.
• Define the standards the team works to: eval methodology, data quality bars, and reproducibility — every dataset and result can be regenerated from a commit, a config, and a seed.

• Turn hypotheses into experiment plans together: what we're testing, the baseline, the ablations, and the result that would change our minds.
• Set the agenda with research scientists. You're expected to bring your own hypotheses, not only implement theirs.
• Take research prototypes to production scale without losing the scientific intent.

• Own synthetic data pipelines that generate, verify, filter, deduplicate, and version data, combining programmatic generators, LLM-based generation, automated verifiers, and targeted expert review.
• Judge data by its effect on models: ablations and fine-tuning or RL experiments that show which attributes (difficulty, diversity, correctness, coverage) drive gains.
• Build quality systems that hold up at volume: gold sets, LLM-judge calibration against expert labels, sampling audits, and agreement metrics.

• Find where frontier models fail and where existing benchmarks have saturated, and design evaluations that measure what's missing.
• Own benchmark methodology end to end: task taxonomy, difficulty calibration, graders and verifiers, contamination controls, held-out splits, and confidence intervals.
• Ship eval harnesses, including agentic and sandboxed-execution evals, that are deterministic, reproducible, and trusted by internal teams and partner labs.
• Make the call on whether a result holds up: partner labs and internal teams act on your sign-off.
• Publish benchmarks, datasets, and findings with our research scientists at venues such as NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR.

• Write code every week on the hardest, highest-leverage parts: core verifier logic, eval statistics, the pipeline component everything else depends on. Expect a third or more of your time on direct technical work.
• Be the person the team brings its hardest debugging and methodology questions to: why a judge disagrees with experts, why an eval number moved, whether a gain is real or noise.
• Act as a technical counterpart to researchers at frontier AI labs: scope requests, set acceptance criteria, and explain results and trade-offs plainly.
• Partner with Strategic Project Leads, delivery, and engineering teams so research advances land in client work and in the platforms the team builds.

• Identify a capability gap, design and ship a benchmark for it, and see it adopted by partner labs.
• Stand up a synthetic data pipeline for long-horizon coding tasks with execution-based verifiers, and run the ablations that show which task properties drive RL gains.
• Calibrate an LLM-judge grading system against expert labels, map where it fails, and decide where humans stay in the loop.
• Design the experiment that tells a partner lab whether a two-point gain on their eval is real.
• Decide which of three competing synthetic data approaches the team should bet on, and design the experiments that settle it.

• Research: Python · PyTorch or JAX · SFT · DPO · PPO / GRPO · RL with verifiable rewards
• Evals & data: LLM-as-judge · programmatic verifiers · sandboxed execution · gold sets · contamination checks
• Platform: Python services (Django / FastAPI) · PostgreSQL · Docker · Terraform · AWS or GCP

• Experience: 8+ years of hands-on ML or research engineering, at least 5 in industry, including 3+ years directly managing research engineers, ML engineers, or researchers (hiring and performance management included).
• Synthetic data at scale: you've owned synthetic or curated data pipelines in production whose output drove training decisions, and can show how you measured their quality and downstream impact.
• Evaluation rigor: you've designed and shipped LLM evals or benchmarks that others used to make model decisions, and understand contamination, saturation, judge bias, inter-annotator agreement, variance, and confidence intervals.
• Experimental judgment: you plan ablations up front, choose baselines honestly, and can tell a real effect from noise.
• Technical depth: strong Python; production experience with PyTorch or JAX; working knowledge of the post-training stack (SFT, DPO, PPO/GRPO, RL with verifiable rewards).
• Technical direction: a track record of setting direction for a team, not only executing a roadmap handed to you.
• Scale: distributed data processing and large evaluation or training jobs (e.g., Ray, Spark, Kubernetes) on AWS or GCP.
• Communication: clear written communication for scientists and non-specialists alike; comfortable presenting results to researchers at partner labs.
• AI-forward: daily use of LLM coding tools (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot) as part of how you ship, with the judgment to review their output critically. This is a must-have.
• Education: PhD or Master's degree in AI, machine learning, computer science, statistics, or a closely related field; PhD preferred. Exceptional equivalent research experience will also be considered. We weigh industry outcomes most heavily.

• Frontier AI lab experience: post-training data, evals, or reward modeling at a frontier lab (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta, xAI) or a top industry research group.
• Built or contributed to a public benchmark or dataset the community uses.

• First-author papers at NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, EMNLP, or similar.
• RL environment and verifier design for agentic tasks: coding agents, tool use, computer use, long-horizon workflows.
• Data valuation or attribution: measuring what each slice of data contributes to a model.
• Depth in a STEM domain such as math, physics, chemistry, or biology (not required).
• Experience managing tech leads or managers, or running several concurrent programs.
• Directing large expert networks through specs, rubrics, and fast feedback loops.

Some of the most important questions in AI can't be answered from inside a single lab: how to evaluate frontier models, how data and RL truly drive capability, and what happens when AI meets the real world. At Turing, we work directly with frontier labs, the academic community, and enterprises deploying AI at scale. That creates a feedback loop where deployment shapes our research and our research shapes the field, and we publish our findings, datasets, and benchmarks openly. Join our talented team at Turing to push the frontier of AI with rigorous science that matters.

• Work directly with leading AI labs and enterprises at the frontier of post-training, evaluation, and synthetic data.
• Build the datasets and benchmarks that improve and measure the capabilities of advanced AI systems.
• Shape how frontier labs measure progress on coding and STEM reasoning.
• Operate with high autonomy, rapid iteration, and meaningful commercial impact.
• Collaborate with exceptional colleagues from organizations including Google, Meta, Amazon, and other leading technology companies.
• Contribute to research that may be shared through technical publications and leading conferences such as ICLR, ICML, and NeurIPS.

$260,000 to $350,000 + Equity

Don't meet every single requirement?

Studies have shown that women and people of color are less likely to apply to jobs unless they meet every single qualification. Turing is proud to be an equal opportunity employer. We do not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, color, national origin, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, marital status, disability, protected veteran status, or any other legally protected characteristics. At Turing we are dedicated to building a diverse, inclusive, and authentic workplace and celebrate authenticity, so if you're excited about this role but your past experience doesn't align perfectly with every qualification in the job description, we encourage you to apply anyways. You may be just the right candidate for this or other roles.

For applicants from the European Union, please review Turing's GDPR notice here.